By October 25, 2015 Uncategorized 11 Comments

Dear Jay,

Like thousands of other Tulsa World readers, I look forward to your fanciful yet insightful commentaries about life which you publish several times a week, typically on the front page of the news section.

I even wrote a previous post based on one of your excellent columns from July 2014, entitled, “But That’s Just Me.”

But today’s column really has me scratching my head. Do you really mean what you wrote, or were you trying to be satirical?

You began by openly criticizing anyone who questions the validity of the current A-F school grading system and imply that we just need to get to work improving these meaningless grades.

If people focused more on improving themselves and their families than complaining about everything from the headline in the newspaper to the testing procedure, maybe more schools would improve their grades.

As shocking as the ridiculous number of F’s was the overall lack of improvement from one year to the next. Once you know the system, you should improve at least a little bit. But barely half a dozen schools made better grades this year than the year before, led by Lee Elementary’s jump from a D to a B-minus.

Yes, I did catch that little dig at people who made comments about the ridiculous headline the World chose to run to accompany the A-F article on Friday. I wonder who you might have been talking about.

You also mentioned Lee Elementary’s increase from a D grade to a B- last year. While this is certainly a noteworthy accomplishment, you failed to mention that the school saw an even larger decrease from a B+ to a D in 2014. In your opinion, were the teachers and principal at Lee in 2014 just being lazy?

You go on to discuss the importance of money to pay our best teachers. I agree that increasing teacher compensation is vitally important to recruiting and retaining a high quality teaching force. Will you be writing a followup column indicting our state legislators and Governor for failing to adequately support our public school system? Do you agree with reducing the state income taxes during a significant fiscal crisis?

I also agree with you that poverty is not the cause of low achievement. At the same time, it is beyond dispute that generational poverty, lack of food, dysfunctional homes, and neglect/abuse are negatively correlated to student success in school, and in life. It would be wonderful if more struggling children in our community had fully functional and committed parents willing to do anything to help their children achieve.

The sad reality is that students who are loved come to school to learn. Those who are not, come to school to be loved.

In every one of these so-called FAILING schools, there are incredibly caring and dedicated educators who are giving their very best to meet children’s needs. Of course, this includes improving student competencies in math and reading, but it also includes arranging for counseling services, meeting medical needs, procuring school supplies, and providing clothes, shoes, and backpacks full of food so that students can eat over the weekend. They are NOT FAILING!

Finally, you challenge these FAILING schools to simply do what the high performing schools are doing.

Eisenhower Elementary wrote the book on A-pluses. Carnegie has made all A’s for three years. Zarrow also has straight A’s.

In the middle schools and junior highs, Carver has all A’s, Thoreau has all B’s.

Edison High School went from a B-minus to a B-plus. Booker T. Washington sets the high school curve with all A-pluses.

Do what they did.

Do you even know what these schools did, Jay?

Every one of the schools you mentioned in a magnet school. This means that their student populations are selected through one of three criteria: interest magnet; lottery magnet; or academic magnet.

But, you are absolutely right. I cannot believe that these FAILING schools didn’t think of this earlier.

To improve their test scores and A-F grade, here is all every Tulsa school needs to do for next year.

Every school should only accept students who meet the following entrance requirements (from TPS magnet school policy):

  • Score in the top 50% on all state testing
  • Have a high GPA
  • Have superb attendance
  • Have excellent behavior and no major discipline infractions
  • Have positive recommendations from three current teachers
  • Be willing to participate in a competitive entrance examination, interview, or audition

With this criteria in place, schools will be able to filter out most of those pesky kids who don’t do well on testing, like children with dyslexia, behavior problems, kids whose parents move a lot, have significant learning disabilities, or who are learning English. That will certainly help the A-F scores.

Additionally, these schools should only accept children with committed, involved parents who are willing to take the time to complete the application, volunteer for school events, and provide transportation to their children’s various school activities. According to the district criteria, parents should also be expected to make a commitment to remain at that school for the duration of the grade levels served by the school.

Mr. Cronley, you offer a brilliant idea. Fixing the problems of low grades on A-F is as simple as turning all of the TPS schools into academic magnet schools—all containing students in the top half of state testing—with high GPA’s, superb attendance, excellent behavior, and generally the type of kids all teachers want to teach.

It would be so easy. Just do what the “good” schools do.

All sarcasm aside, Jay. The solution does appear simple for many people who don’t fully comprehend the wide range of challenges faced by teachers and school leaders in Tulsa and other high poverty districts. This is evident from perusing many of the online reader comments that accompanied the main story.

The A-F system is highly flawed, yet is difficult to explain why to those who don’t have the time or interest to really evaluate how the grades are computed. Allow me to help with one piece by briefly discussing the growth component of the A-F formula.

Half of the final A-F school grade is computed from Whole School Growth (25%) and Bottom Quartile Growth (25%). By having a school where the vast majority of students earned passing test scores the previous year (top 50% of test takers), it is virtually guaranteed that the school will earn a high grade in both of these components the next year.

This is due to the fact that, by state rules, schools are awarded a growth point if a student maintains a score of proficient or higher from one year to the next.

Therefore, a student who earned a perfect score of 990 last year would earn a growth point even if their score decreased to the minimum passing score of 700. This would reflect about a 30% drop in overall score yet would still count as GROWTH. Does that make sense?

Conversely, a student who scored an unsatisfactory score of 500 last year may demonstrate significant growth to 550 this year. However, if that level of growth did not cause them to move up one category or exceed the state average growth for that test, the school will earn a zero!

As a result, a magnet school where nearly 100 percent of students scored proficient or higher one year, earns a growth point for EVERY kid who stays proficient or higher this year, even if EVERY child’s score were to go down. On the other hand, a school with large numbers of very low performing students could cause EVERY student to experience growth, yet earn very few points because of the SYSTEM!

Moreover, because of the way these students are counted in both growth components, low scoring schools get smacked twice, while high performing schools get a double gift.

The A-F system is flawed, inaccurate, unreliable and invalid. It’s not making excuses to say so. It is the truth.

Your argument of just “doing what they do” is akin to telling all of the NFL teams that all they need to do is copy what the New England Patriots did last year and go win a Super Bowl.

School improvement is a difficult and complex process which must be viewed through the unique context of each school and its leaders, teachers, parents, students, and resources. There are no short cuts.

But, that’s just me!

This Post Has Been Viewed 3,421 Times

Share this: